REVIEW 2 cited by
Advancing Object Detection in Transportation with Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs): A Comprehensive Review and Empirical Testing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This study aims to comprehensively review and empirically evaluate the application of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and Large Vision Models (VLMs) in object detection for transportation systems. In the first fold, we provide a background about the potential benefits of MLLMs in transportation applications and conduct a comprehensive review of current MLLM technologies in previous studies. We highlight their effectiveness and limitations in object detection within various transportation scenarios. The second fold involves providing an overview of the taxonomy of end-to-end object detection in transportation applications and future directions. Building on this, we proposed empirical analysis for testing MLLMs on three real-world transportation problems that include object detection tasks namely, road safety attributes extraction, safety-critical event detection, and visual reasoning of thermal images. Our findings provide a detailed assessment of MLLM performance, uncovering both strengths and areas for improvement. Finally, we discuss practical limitations and challenges of MLLMs in enhancing object detection in transportation, thereby offering a roadmap for future research and development in this critical area.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Large Language Models (LLMs) as Traffic Control Systems at Urban Intersections: A New Paradigm
A fine-tuned GPT-4o-mini detects conflicts in synthetic four-leg intersection scenarios with 83% accuracy and produces traffic-management text with high ROUGE-L scores against the simulator's templated references.
-
Detecting AI-Generated Text in Educational Content: Leveraging Machine Learning and Explainable AI for Academic Integrity
XGBoost and Random Forest can distinguish ChatGPT-written cybersecurity paragraphs from human Wikipedia paragraphs with 81 to 83% accuracy, and a narrow XGBoost model beat GPTZero in a three-class test, yet the benchm...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.