A position paper synthesizing research to caution that unchecked AI use in education risks cognitive, emotional, and ethical harm, and recommending principles for critical AI use.
Exploring the Factors of "AI Guilt" Among Students -- Are You Guilty of Using AI in Your Homework?
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 12 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This study explores the phenomenon of "AI guilt" among secondary school students, a form of moral discomfort arising from the use of AI tools in academic tasks traditionally performed by humans. Through qualitative methodologies, the research examines the factors contributing to AI guilt, its social and psychological impacts, and its implications for educational practices. The findings revealed three main dimensions for AI guilt - perceived laziness and authenticity, fear of judgment, and identity and self-efficacy concerns. The findings suggest a need to redefine academic integrity and shift our mindset to reconsider what we should value in education. The study also emphasizes the importance of ethical guidelines and educational support and provides implications to help students navigate the complexities of AI in education, reducing feelings of guilt while enhancing learning outcomes.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Do AI tutors empower or enslave learners? Toward a critical use of AI in education
A position paper synthesizing research to caution that unchecked AI use in education risks cognitive, emotional, and ethical harm, and recommending principles for critical AI use.