REVIEW 1 cited by
Exploring the Factors of "AI Guilt" Among Students -- Are You Guilty of Using AI in Your Homework?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
This study explores the phenomenon of "AI guilt" among secondary school students, a form of moral discomfort arising from the use of AI tools in academic tasks traditionally performed by humans. Through qualitative methodologies, the research examines the factors contributing to AI guilt, its social and psychological impacts, and its implications for educational practices. The findings revealed three main dimensions for AI guilt - perceived laziness and authenticity, fear of judgment, and identity and self-efficacy concerns. The findings suggest a need to redefine academic integrity and shift our mindset to reconsider what we should value in education. The study also emphasizes the importance of ethical guidelines and educational support and provides implications to help students navigate the complexities of AI in education, reducing feelings of guilt while enhancing learning outcomes.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Do AI tutors empower or enslave learners? Toward a critical use of AI in education
A position paper synthesizing research to caution that unchecked AI use in education risks cognitive, emotional, and ethical harm, and recommending principles for critical AI use.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.