A neuro-symbolic Rational Speech Act model with LLM proposers and evaluators predicts human question-answer patterns about as well as the fully hand-specified probabilistic model.
Learning to refer informatively by amortizing pragmatic reasoning
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
A hallmark of human language is the ability to effectively and efficiently convey contextually relevant information. One theory for how humans reason about language is presented in the Rational Speech Acts (RSA) framework, which captures pragmatic phenomena via a process of recursive social reasoning (Goodman & Frank, 2016). However, RSA represents ideal reasoning in an unconstrained setting. We explore the idea that speakers might learn to amortize the cost of RSA computation over time by directly optimizing for successful communication with an internal listener model. In simulations with grounded neural speakers and listeners across two communication game datasets representing synthetic and human-generated data, we find that our amortized model is able to quickly generate language that is effective and concise across a range of contexts, without the need for explicit pragmatic reasoning.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Integrating Neural and Symbolic Components in a Model of Pragmatic Question-Answering
A neuro-symbolic Rational Speech Act model with LLM proposers and evaluators predicts human question-answer patterns about as well as the fully hand-specified probabilistic model.