Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to refer informatively by amortizing pragmatic reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2006.00418 v1 pith:MLRVJAZC submitted 2020-05-31 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoninglanguagepragmaticacrosscommunicationmodelspeakersability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A hallmark of human language is the ability to effectively and efficiently convey contextually relevant information. One theory for how humans reason about language is presented in the Rational Speech Acts (RSA) framework, which captures pragmatic phenomena via a process of recursive social reasoning (Goodman & Frank, 2016). However, RSA represents ideal reasoning in an unconstrained setting. We explore the idea that speakers might learn to amortize the cost of RSA computation over time by directly optimizing for successful communication with an internal listener model. In simulations with grounded neural speakers and listeners across two communication game datasets representing synthetic and human-generated data, we find that our amortized model is able to quickly generate language that is effective and concise across a range of contexts, without the need for explicit pragmatic reasoning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Integrating Neural and Symbolic Components in a Model of Pragmatic Question-Answering

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A neuro-symbolic Rational Speech Act model with LLM proposers and evaluators predicts human question-answer patterns about as well as the fully hand-specified probabilistic model.

Pith tools