Weak-to-strong generalization is nearly inevitable in linear logistic regression for most student-teacher pairs without any model capacity mismatch.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.03109 , year=
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
abstract
Weak-to-strong generalization (W2SG) has emerged as a promising paradigm for stimulating the capabilities of strong pre-trained models by leveraging supervision from weaker supervisors. To improve the performance of the strong model, existing methods often require additional weak models or complex procedures, leading to substantial computational and memory overhead. Motivated by the effectiveness of $f$-divergence loss in various machine learning domains, we introduce $f$-divergence as an information-theoretic loss function framework in W2SG. Our theoretical analysis reveals fundamental limitations and equivalence of different $f$-divergence losses in W2SG, supported by sample complexity bounds and information-theoretic insights. We empirically demonstrate that $f$-divergence loss, which generalizes widely-used metrics like KL divergence, effectively improves generalization and noise tolerance of the strong model in practice.
fields
cs.LG 2years
2026 2representative citing papers
Transferring a weak model’s RL-induced log-ratio policy shift on a strong student’s own rollouts raises AIME accuracy more cheaply than imitating the weak teacher or running matched-step RL on the student.
citing papers explorer
-
Weak-to-Strong Generalization is Nearly Inevitable (in Linear Models)
Weak-to-strong generalization is nearly inevitable in linear logistic regression for most student-teacher pairs without any model capacity mismatch.
-
Weak-to-Strong Generalization via Direct On-Policy Distillation
Transferring a weak model’s RL-induced log-ratio policy shift on a strong student’s own rollouts raises AIME accuracy more cheaply than imitating the weak teacher or running matched-step RL on the student.