REVIEW 2 cited by
On Weak-to-Strong Generalization and f-Divergence
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Weak-to-strong generalization (W2SG) has emerged as a promising paradigm for stimulating the capabilities of strong pre-trained models by leveraging supervision from weaker supervisors. To improve the performance of the strong model, existing methods often require additional weak models or complex procedures, leading to substantial computational and memory overhead. Motivated by the effectiveness of $f$-divergence loss in various machine learning domains, we introduce $f$-divergence as an information-theoretic loss function framework in W2SG. Our theoretical analysis reveals fundamental limitations and equivalence of different $f$-divergence losses in W2SG, supported by sample complexity bounds and information-theoretic insights. We empirically demonstrate that $f$-divergence loss, which generalizes widely-used metrics like KL divergence, effectively improves generalization and noise tolerance of the strong model in practice.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Weak-to-Strong Generalization via Direct On-Policy Distillation
Transferring the log-ratio of a small model's pre-RL and post-RL checkpoints provides a dense implicit reward that improves stronger student models at a fraction of the cost of direct RL.
-
Weak-to-Strong On-Policy Distillation
A strong LLM is improved by distilling from the logit difference of two weaker models instead of from a stronger teacher.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.