Machine unlearning should be restricted to dataset-defined deletion achieving retraining equivalence, while other LLM tasks require separate terminology and evaluation baselines.
From Domains to Instances: Dual-Granularity Data Synthesis for LLM Unlearning
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Although machine unlearning is essential for removing private, harmful, or copyrighted content from LLMs, current benchmarks often fail to faithfully represent the true ``forgetting scope'' learned by the model. We formalize two distinct unlearning granularities, domain-level and instance-level, and propose \BiForget, an automated framework for synthesizing high-quality forget sets. Unlike prior work relying on \emph{external} generators, \BiForget exploits the target model per se to elicit data that matches its internal knowledge distribution through seed-guided and adversarial prompting. Our experiments across diverse benchmarks show that it achieves a superior balance of relevance, diversity, and efficiency. Quantitatively, in the Harry Potter domain, it improves relevance by ${\sim}20$ and diversity by ${\sim}$0.05 while \emph{halving} the total data size compared to SOTAs. Ultimately, it facilitates more robust forgetting and better utility preservation, providing a more rigorous foundation for evaluating LLM unlearning.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Position: The Term "Machine Unlearning" Is Overused in LLMs
Machine unlearning should be restricted to dataset-defined deletion achieving retraining equivalence, while other LLM tasks require separate terminology and evaluation baselines.