An argument paper reframes LLM explainability as an embodied, situated practice based on Dourish and enactivist cognition, identifying ontological obstacles in internal explanations and advocating affordance-based designs.
Hutto and Glenda Satne
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.HC 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Embodied Explainability and Ontological Obstacles: Why We Struggle to Explain the Answers of Large Language Models (LLMs)
An argument paper reframes LLM explainability as an embodied, situated practice based on Dourish and enactivist cognition, identifying ontological obstacles in internal explanations and advocating affordance-based designs.