Pith. sign in

Inference Time Optimization with Confidence Dynamics

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Inference time optimization techniques, such as repeated sampling, have significantly advanced the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the critical role of model uncertainty remains largely underexplored in these optimization strategies. In this paper, we investigate the dynamics of confidence along reasoning trajectories and for first time reveal a surprising and unique pattern: correct answer traces tend to exhibit confidence improvement over time (positive confidence gain), while incorrect traces show attenuated or declining confidence as reasoning proceeds. Based on this observation, we propose Confidence Dynamic Gain (CDG) based voting, which incorporates how the confidence trajectory of the response evolves along the reasoning chain. Experiments across four open-source architectures (DeepSeek-R1, gpt-oss, Gemma-3, Qwen-QwQ) on the AIME24/25, HMMT25, and BRUMO25 benchmarks demonstrate that CDG yields a significant performance boost over baselines. These results demonstrate that our method provides a robust discriminative signal for improving answer selection in LLM reasoning. We also provide theoretical insights for this phenomenon. Code will be released at https://github.com/Accenture/CDG.git.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

ACCEPT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

support 1

representative citing papers

Consilience for Verifier-Free Test-Time Scaling

cs.CL · 2026-08-10 · accept · novelty 6.0

Selecting LLM rollouts with low early confidence and high final confidence outperforms confidence-maximizing methods on hard math and free-form code benchmarks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Consilience for Verifier-Free Test-Time Scaling cs.CL · 2026-08-10 · accept · none · ref 39 · internal anchor

    Selecting LLM rollouts with low early confidence and high final confidence outperforms confidence-maximizing methods on hard math and free-form code benchmarks.