Publishing AI research artifacts, such as models and code on GitHub or Hugging Face, may fall outside the EU AI Act's research exceptions and trigger provider obligations.
Mapping the Potential of Explainable AI for Fairness Along the AI Lifecycle
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems across various domains is increasingly surfacing issues related to algorithmic fairness, especially in high-stakes scenarios. Thus, critical considerations of how fairness in AI systems might be improved -- and what measures are available to aid this process -- are overdue. Many researchers and policymakers see explainable AI (XAI) as a promising way to increase fairness in AI systems. However, there is a wide variety of XAI methods and fairness conceptions expressing different desiderata, and the precise connections between XAI and fairness remain largely nebulous. Besides, different measures to increase algorithmic fairness might be applicable at different points throughout an AI system's lifecycle. Yet, there currently is no coherent mapping of fairness desiderata along the AI lifecycle. In this paper, we we distill eight fairness desiderata, map them along the AI lifecycle, and discuss how XAI could help address each of them. We hope to provide orientation for practical applications and to inspire XAI research specifically focused on these fairness desiderata.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Position: EU AI Act's Research Exemptions Can Break the Publication Norms of Major AI Conferences
Publishing AI research artifacts, such as models and code on GitHub or Hugging Face, may fall outside the EU AI Act's research exceptions and trigger provider obligations.