Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Mapping the Potential of Explainable AI for Fairness Along the AI Lifecycle

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.18736 v4 pith:CBZT5AGE submitted 2024-04-29 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY
keywords fairnessdesideratalifecyclealongdifferentsystemsalgorithmicexplainable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI) systems across various domains is increasingly surfacing issues related to algorithmic fairness, especially in high-stakes scenarios. Thus, critical considerations of how fairness in AI systems might be improved -- and what measures are available to aid this process -- are overdue. Many researchers and policymakers see explainable AI (XAI) as a promising way to increase fairness in AI systems. However, there is a wide variety of XAI methods and fairness conceptions expressing different desiderata, and the precise connections between XAI and fairness remain largely nebulous. Besides, different measures to increase algorithmic fairness might be applicable at different points throughout an AI system's lifecycle. Yet, there currently is no coherent mapping of fairness desiderata along the AI lifecycle. In this paper, we we distill eight fairness desiderata, map them along the AI lifecycle, and discuss how XAI could help address each of them. We hope to provide orientation for practical applications and to inspire XAI research specifically focused on these fairness desiderata.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Position: EU AI Act's Research Exemptions Can Break the Publication Norms of Major AI Conferences

    cs.CY 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Publishing AI research artifacts, such as models and code on GitHub or Hugging Face, may fall outside the EU AI Act's research exceptions and trigger provider obligations.

Pith tools