LF-Steering steers sparse-autoencoder features instead of whole layers or attention heads to improve the semantic consistency of Llama-2-7B-Chat on paraphrase benchmarks, but the steering formula discards direction.
Does Instruction Tuning Make LLMs More Consistent?
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The purpose of instruction tuning is enabling zero-shot performance, but instruction tuning has also been shown to improve chain-of-thought reasoning and value alignment (Si et al., 2023). Here we consider the impact on $\textit{consistency}$, i.e., the sensitivity of language models to small perturbations in the input. We compare 10 instruction-tuned LLaMA models to the original LLaMA-7b model and show that almost across-the-board they become more consistent, both in terms of their representations and their predictions in zero-shot and downstream tasks. We explain these improvements through mechanistic analyses of factual recall.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
LF-Steering: Latent Feature Activation Steering for Enhancing Semantic Consistency in Large Language Models
LF-Steering steers sparse-autoencoder features instead of whole layers or attention heads to improve the semantic consistency of Llama-2-7B-Chat on paraphrase benchmarks, but the steering formula discards direction.