Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Does Instruction Tuning Make LLMs More Consistent?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.15206 v3 pith:UWFGYZI7 submitted 2024-04-23 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords instructiontuningconsistentmodelszero-shotacross-the-boardalignmentalmost
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

The purpose of instruction tuning is enabling zero-shot performance, but instruction tuning has also been shown to improve chain-of-thought reasoning and value alignment (Si et al., 2023). Here we consider the impact on $\textit{consistency}$, i.e., the sensitivity of language models to small perturbations in the input. We compare 10 instruction-tuned LLaMA models to the original LLaMA-7b model and show that almost across-the-board they become more consistent, both in terms of their representations and their predictions in zero-shot and downstream tasks. We explain these improvements through mechanistic analyses of factual recall.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LF-Steering: Latent Feature Activation Steering for Enhancing Semantic Consistency in Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    LF-Steering steers sparse-autoencoder features instead of whole layers or attention heads to improve the semantic consistency of Llama-2-7B-Chat on paraphrase benchmarks, but the steering formula discards direction.

Pith tools