REVIEW 1 cited by
Does Instruction Tuning Make LLMs More Consistent?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The purpose of instruction tuning is enabling zero-shot performance, but instruction tuning has also been shown to improve chain-of-thought reasoning and value alignment (Si et al., 2023). Here we consider the impact on $\textit{consistency}$, i.e., the sensitivity of language models to small perturbations in the input. We compare 10 instruction-tuned LLaMA models to the original LLaMA-7b model and show that almost across-the-board they become more consistent, both in terms of their representations and their predictions in zero-shot and downstream tasks. We explain these improvements through mechanistic analyses of factual recall.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
LF-Steering: Latent Feature Activation Steering for Enhancing Semantic Consistency in Large Language Models
LF-Steering steers sparse-autoencoder features instead of whole layers or attention heads to improve the semantic consistency of Llama-2-7B-Chat on paraphrase benchmarks, but the steering formula discards direction.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.