Predictive Bayesian inference posteriors concentrate onto a forward-model-dependent quantity and produce miscalibrated credible sets unless the predictive model contains the true data-generating process.
Risk Bounds for the Majority Vote: From a PAC-Bayesian Analysis to a Learning Algorithm
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We propose an extensive analysis of the behavior of majority votes in binary classification. In particular, we introduce a risk bound for majority votes, called the C-bound, that takes into account the average quality of the voters and their average disagreement. We also propose an extensive PAC-Bayesian analysis that shows how the C-bound can be estimated from various observations contained in the training data. The analysis intends to be self-contained and can be used as introductory material to PAC-Bayesian statistical learning theory. It starts from a general PAC-Bayesian perspective and ends with uncommon PAC-Bayesian bounds. Some of these bounds contain no Kullback-Leibler divergence and others allow kernel functions to be used as voters (via the sample compression setting). Finally, out of the analysis, we propose the MinCq learning algorithm that basically minimizes the C-bound. MinCq reduces to a simple quadratic program. Aside from being theoretically grounded, MinCq achieves state-of-the-art performance, as shown in our extensive empirical comparison with both AdaBoost and the Support Vector Machine.
years
2026 2representative citing papers
Learning a margin-based confidence ranker for LLM judges improves agreement-target success in cascaded selective evaluation compared to heuristic confidence scores.
citing papers explorer
-
Concentration and Calibration in Predictive Bayesian Inference
Predictive Bayesian inference posteriors concentrate onto a forward-model-dependent quantity and produce miscalibrated credible sets unless the predictive model contains the true data-generating process.
-
Margin-Adaptive Confidence Ranking for Reliable LLM Judgement
Learning a margin-based confidence ranker for LLM judges improves agreement-target success in cascaded selective evaluation compared to heuristic confidence scores.