pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

Agent Security Bench (ASB): Formalizing and Benchmarking Attacks and Defenses in LLM-based Agents

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (62%).

42 Pith papers citing it
Background 62% of classified citations
abstract

Although LLM-based agents, powered by Large Language Models (LLMs), can use external tools and memory mechanisms to solve complex real-world tasks, they may also introduce critical security vulnerabilities. However, the existing literature does not comprehensively evaluate attacks and defenses against LLM-based agents. To address this, we introduce Agent Security Bench (ASB), a comprehensive framework designed to formalize, benchmark, and evaluate the attacks and defenses of LLM-based agents, including 10 scenarios (e.g., e-commerce, autonomous driving, finance), 10 agents targeting the scenarios, over 400 tools, 27 different types of attack/defense methods, and 7 evaluation metrics. Based on ASB, we benchmark 10 prompt injection attacks, a memory poisoning attack, a novel Plan-of-Thought backdoor attack, 4 mixed attacks, and 11 corresponding defenses across 13 LLM backbones. Our benchmark results reveal critical vulnerabilities in different stages of agent operation, including system prompt, user prompt handling, tool usage, and memory retrieval, with the highest average attack success rate of 84.30\%, but limited effectiveness shown in current defenses, unveiling important works to be done in terms of agent security for the community. We also introduce a new metric to evaluate the agents' capability to balance utility and security. Our code can be found at https://github.com/agiresearch/ASB.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 9 baseline 2 dataset 2

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 40 2025 2

representative citing papers

Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents

cs.CY · 2026-04-11 · accept · novelty 8.0

This paper delivers the first systematic taxonomy and cross-benchmark consistency analysis of 40 agent safety benchmarks, finding broad but shallow risk coverage, no ranking concordance across evaluations, and that benchmark choice systematically alters reported safety.

Hierarchical Attacks for Multi-Modal Multi-Agent Reasoning

cs.AI · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

HAM³ achieves up to 78.3% attack success rate on the GQA benchmark by hierarchically attacking perception, communication, and reasoning layers in multi-modal multi-agent systems.

Formal Policy Enforcement for Real-World Agentic Systems

cs.CR · 2026-02-18 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

FORGE enforces security policies in agentic systems via Datalog over abstract predicates with an observability service and reference monitor that guarantees policy semantics when the environment contract holds.

Web Agents Should Adopt the Plan-Then-Execute Paradigm

cs.CR · 2026-05-14 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Web agents should default to planning a complete task program before observing live web content to reduce prompt injection exposure, since WebArena tasks are compatible and 80% need no runtime LLM calls.

ARGUS: Defending LLM Agents Against Context-Aware Prompt Injection

cs.CR · 2026-05-05 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

ARGUS defends LLM agents from context-aware prompt injections by tracking information provenance and verifying decisions against trustworthy evidence, reducing attack success to 3.8% while retaining 87.5% task utility.

Trojan Hippo: Weaponizing Agent Memory for Data Exfiltration

cs.CR · 2026-05-03 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

The paper defines and evaluates Trojan Hippo attacks on LLM agent memory, showing 85-100% success in data exfiltration across backends and reduced rates with defenses at varying utility costs.

citing papers explorer

Showing 42 of 42 citing papers.