At redshifts 2 to 7, black holes in massive elliptical hosts show no sign of the cosmological growth needed to make black holes the dark energy, with k=0.13 +/- 0.27 instead of k=3.
Comment on "Observational Evidence for Cosmological Coupling of Black Holes and its Implications for an Astrophysical Source of Dark Energy"
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
abstract
It was recently claimed that black holes can explain the accelerated expansion of the universe. Here I point out that this claim is based on a confusion about the principle of least action, undermining the link between black holes and dark energy.
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
astro-ph.CO 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Black Holes in the Red-sequence Elliptical Galaxies at Redshifts $\sim 0.7-2.5$: Not Dark Energy Source but Remanants of Little Red Dots
At redshifts 2 to 7, black holes in massive elliptical hosts show no sign of the cosmological growth needed to make black holes the dark energy, with k=0.13 +/- 0.27 instead of k=3.