pith. sign in

FlexGuard: Continuous Risk Scoring for Strictness-Adaptive LLM Content Moderation

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Ensuring the safety of LLM-generated content is essential for real-world deployment. Most existing guardrail models formulate moderation as a fixed binary classification task, implicitly assuming a fixed definition of harmfulness. In practice, enforcement strictness - how conservatively harmfulness is defined and enforced - varies across platforms and evolves over time, making binary moderators brittle under shifting requirements. We first introduce FlexBench, a strictness-adaptive LLM moderation benchmark that enables controlled evaluation under multiple strictness regimes. Experiments on FlexBench reveal substantial cross-strictness inconsistency in existing moderators: models that perform well under one regime can degrade substantially under others, limiting their practical usability. To address this, we propose FlexGuard, an LLM-based moderator that outputs a calibrated continuous risk score reflecting risk severity and supports strictness-specific decisions via thresholding. We train FlexGuard via risk-alignment optimization to improve score-severity consistency and provide practical threshold selection strategies to adapt to target strictness at deployment. Experiments on FlexBench and public benchmarks demonstrate that FlexGuard achieves higher moderation accuracy and substantially improved robustness under varying strictness. We release the source code and data to support reproducibility.

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

clear filters

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper after filters.

  • SafePyramid: A Hierarchical Benchmark for In-context Policy Guardrailing cs.AI · 2026-06-29 · unverdicted · none · ref 9 · internal anchor

    SafePyramid is a three-level benchmark showing frontier LLMs identify all violated rules in only 54.0%, 35.3%, and 12.9% of cases on L0, L1, and L2 respectively, indicating in-context policy guardrailing remains difficult.