A rapid tertiary review of nine AI governance reviews finds a focus on high-level frameworks and principles, with little concrete guidance on governance mechanisms.
Towards a Responsible AI Metrics Catalogue: A Collection of Metrics for AI Accountability
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly through the advent of large-scale generative AI (GenAI) models such as Large Language Models (LLMs), has become a transformative element in contemporary technology. While these models have unlocked new possibilities, they simultaneously present significant challenges, such as concerns over data privacy and the propensity to generate misleading or fabricated content. Current frameworks for Responsible AI (RAI) often fall short in providing the granular guidance necessary for tangible application, especially for Accountability-a principle that is pivotal for ensuring transparent and auditable decision-making, bolstering public trust, and meeting increasing regulatory expectations. This study bridges the accountability gap by introducing our effort towards a comprehensive metrics catalogue, formulated through a systematic multivocal literature review (MLR) that integrates findings from both academic and grey literature. Our catalogue delineates process metrics that underpin procedural integrity, resource metrics that provide necessary tools and frameworks, and product metrics that reflect the outputs of AI systems. This tripartite framework is designed to operationalize Accountability in AI, with a special emphasis on addressing the intricacies of GenAI.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SE 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
other 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Toward Effective AI Governance: A Review of Principles
A rapid tertiary review of nine AI governance reviews finds a focus on high-level frameworks and principles, with little concrete guidance on governance mechanisms.