Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards a Responsible AI Metrics Catalogue: A Collection of Metrics for AI Accountability

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.13158 v3 pith:ITGFXD5K submitted 2023-11-22 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords metricsaccountabilitycataloguemodelsframeworksgenailiteraturenecessary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly through the advent of large-scale generative AI (GenAI) models such as Large Language Models (LLMs), has become a transformative element in contemporary technology. While these models have unlocked new possibilities, they simultaneously present significant challenges, such as concerns over data privacy and the propensity to generate misleading or fabricated content. Current frameworks for Responsible AI (RAI) often fall short in providing the granular guidance necessary for tangible application, especially for Accountability-a principle that is pivotal for ensuring transparent and auditable decision-making, bolstering public trust, and meeting increasing regulatory expectations. This study bridges the accountability gap by introducing our effort towards a comprehensive metrics catalogue, formulated through a systematic multivocal literature review (MLR) that integrates findings from both academic and grey literature. Our catalogue delineates process metrics that underpin procedural integrity, resource metrics that provide necessary tools and frameworks, and product metrics that reflect the outputs of AI systems. This tripartite framework is designed to operationalize Accountability in AI, with a special emphasis on addressing the intricacies of GenAI.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Toward Effective AI Governance: A Review of Principles

    cs.SE 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A rapid tertiary review of nine AI governance reviews finds a focus on high-level frameworks and principles, with little concrete guidance on governance mechanisms.

Pith tools