In a sector-coupled European energy system model, e-biofuels cut system costs up to 2.7% and liquid fuel costs over 10% for stringent emissions targets when biomass is scarce and fossil fuels are barred.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
physics.soc-ph 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
Energy system modeling shows methanol backstop increases costs 2.4% over hydrogen in high-electrification carbon-neutral scenarios while simplifying logistics.
citing papers explorer
-
E-biofuels reduce the cost of achieving emissions targets in hard-to-electrify sectors
In a sector-coupled European energy system model, e-biofuels cut system costs up to 2.7% and liquid fuel costs over 10% for stringent emissions targets when biomass is scarce and fossil fuels are barred.
-
A Minimal Methanol Backstop for High Electrification Scenarios
Energy system modeling shows methanol backstop increases costs 2.4% over hydrogen in high-electrification carbon-neutral scenarios while simplifying logistics.