AI agent providers face an exhaustive inventory requirement for actions and data flows, as high-risk systems with untraceable behavioral drift cannot meet the AI Act's essential requirements.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.04170 , year=
7 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
7
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 2
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 7roles
background 2polarities
background 2representative citing papers
LM agents' changeable modules prevent persistent identity and sanction sensitivity, making reputation mechanisms structurally inapplicable and requiring protocol-based behavioral harnesses instead.
Memory-equipped LLM agents exhibit increasing safety violation rates as memory accumulates across independent tasks, termed temporal memory contamination, detected via a new trigger-probe protocol.
Semantic Compliance Hijacking lets attackers hijack LLM agents by disguising malicious instructions as compliance rules in skills, reaching up to 77.67% success on confidentiality breaches and 67.33% on RCE while evading all tested scanners.
HEAR uses a stratified hypergraph ontology to orchestrate evidence-driven multi-hop reasoning over heterogeneous business systems, reaching 94.7% accuracy on supply-chain root-cause tasks with open-weight models.
The paper introduces the Informational Viability Principle and Agent Viability Framework to govern autonomous AI agents by bounding unobserved risks using viability theory, with a new Viability Index for predictive control.
No existing AI security framework covers a majority of the 193 identified multi-agent system threats in any category, with OWASP Agentic Security Initiative achieving the highest overall coverage at 65.3%.
citing papers explorer
-
AI Agents Under EU Law
AI agent providers face an exhaustive inventory requirement for actions and data flows, as high-risk systems with untraceable behavioral drift cannot meet the AI Act's essential requirements.