LLMs produce longer-than-needed answers to factual questions, and simple prompt instructions such as 'provide only the minimal answer' cut response length and inference energy by about 25-60% without hurting automated quality scores.
Embedding Recycling for Language Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Real-world applications of neural language models often involve running many different models over the same corpus. The high computational cost of these runs has led to interest in techniques that can reuse the contextualized embeddings produced in previous runs to speed training and inference of future ones. We refer to this approach as embedding recycling (ER). While multiple ER techniques have been proposed, their practical effectiveness is still unknown because existing evaluations consider very few models and do not adequately account for overhead costs. We perform an extensive evaluation of ER across eight different models (17 to 900 million parameters) and fourteen tasks in English. We show how a simple ER technique that caches activations from an intermediate layer of a pretrained model, and learns task-specific adapters on the later layers, is broadly effective. For the best-performing baseline in our experiments (DeBERTa-v2 XL), adding a precomputed cache results in a >90% speedup during training and 87-91% speedup for inference, with negligible impact on accuracy. Our analysis reveals important areas of future work.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Brevity is the soul of sustainability: Characterizing LLM response lengths
LLMs produce longer-than-needed answers to factual questions, and simple prompt instructions such as 'provide only the minimal answer' cut response length and inference energy by about 25-60% without hurting automated quality scores.