Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Embedding Recycling for Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.04993 v3 pith:7BSN4WIT submitted 2022-07-11 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords modelsdifferentembeddingfutureinferencelanguagerecyclingruns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Real-world applications of neural language models often involve running many different models over the same corpus. The high computational cost of these runs has led to interest in techniques that can reuse the contextualized embeddings produced in previous runs to speed training and inference of future ones. We refer to this approach as embedding recycling (ER). While multiple ER techniques have been proposed, their practical effectiveness is still unknown because existing evaluations consider very few models and do not adequately account for overhead costs. We perform an extensive evaluation of ER across eight different models (17 to 900 million parameters) and fourteen tasks in English. We show how a simple ER technique that caches activations from an intermediate layer of a pretrained model, and learns task-specific adapters on the later layers, is broadly effective. For the best-performing baseline in our experiments (DeBERTa-v2 XL), adding a precomputed cache results in a >90% speedup during training and 87-91% speedup for inference, with negligible impact on accuracy. Our analysis reveals important areas of future work.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Brevity is the soul of sustainability: Characterizing LLM response lengths

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs produce longer-than-needed answers to factual questions, and simple prompt instructions such as 'provide only the minimal answer' cut response length and inference energy by about 25-60% without hurting automated...

Pith tools