Traditional ML and deep learning are tied in accuracy on 72 dynamic PSN datasets for protein structure classification, with DL over 10 times slower.
Protein Fold Classification at Scale: Benchmarking and Pretraining
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Classifying protein topology is essential for deciphering biological function, but progress is held back by the lack of large-scale benchmarks that avoid duplicates and by models that do not scale well. We introduce TEDBench, a large-scale, non-redundant benchmark for protein fold classification constructed from the Encyclopedia of Domains (TED) and Foldseek-clustered AlphaFold structures. We show that on TEDBench, current protein representation learning methods either require very large models or fail to deliver strong performance. To address this challenge, we propose Masked Invariant Autoencoders (MiAE), a self-supervised framework for protein structure representation learning. MiAE uses an extremely high masking ratio of up to 90% with an $\mathrm{SE(3)}$-invariant encoder and a lightweight decoder that reconstructs backbone coordinates from the latent representation and mask tokens. MiAE scales well and outperforms supervised counterparts and state-of-the-art baselines on TEDBench, establishing a strong recipe for protein fold classification. To test transfer beyond AlphaFold structures, we further benchmark on a curated dataset from experimental structures of CATH v4.4. TEDBench is available at https://github.com/BorgwardtLab/TEDBench.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Traditional machine learning vs. deep learning from dynamic graph representations of proteins' 3D folds in the task of protein structure classification
Traditional ML and deep learning are tied in accuracy on 72 dynamic PSN datasets for protein structure classification, with DL over 10 times slower.