LLM-based security code review is vulnerable to framing bias, with a novel iterative refinement attack achieving 100% success in reintroducing vulnerabilities across real projects.
GRACE: Empowering LLM-based software vulnerability detection with graph structure and in-context learning
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
4
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
ML4AVD research remains locked into binary function-level classification of C/C++ vulnerabilities because twelve pain points in the pipeline reinforce each other through feedback loops.
A literature survey that introduces a taxonomy for LLM reasoning paradigms, analyzes methodological trends, and synthesizes failure modes from over 300 papers.
LLMSniffer improves detection of LLM-generated code on GPTSniffer and Whodunit benchmarks by fine-tuning GraphCodeBERT via two-stage supervised contrastive learning plus preprocessing and MLP classification.
citing papers explorer
-
Direction for Detection: A Survey of Automated Vulnerability Detection and all of its Pain Points
ML4AVD research remains locked into binary function-level classification of C/C++ vulnerabilities because twelve pain points in the pipeline reinforce each other through feedback loops.