Unsupervised recalibration corrects a classifier's probabilities under label-prior shift using only its predictions on unlabeled field data, with per-subpopulation extensions and empirical comparisons.
Fisher consistency for prior probability shift
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We introduce Fisher consistency in the sense of unbiasedness as a desirable property for estimators of class prior probabilities. Lack of Fisher consistency could be used as a criterion to dismiss estimators that are unlikely to deliver precise estimates in test datasets under prior probability and more general dataset shift. The usefulness of this unbiasedness concept is demonstrated with three examples of classifiers used for quantification: Adjusted Classify & Count, EM-algorithm and CDE-Iterate. We find that Adjusted Classify & Count and EM-algorithm are Fisher consistent. A counter-example shows that CDE-Iterate is not Fisher consistent and, therefore, cannot be trusted to deliver reliable estimates of class probabilities.
fields
stat.ML 1years
2019 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Unsupervised Recalibration
Unsupervised recalibration corrects a classifier's probabilities under label-prior shift using only its predictions on unlabeled field data, with per-subpopulation extensions and empirical comparisons.