Every finite relation algebra with at most four atoms has a network satisfaction problem that is either in P or NP-hard, with the paper determining which.
Hereditary First-Order Logic: the tractable quantifier prefix classes
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Many computational problems can be modelled as the class of all finite structures $\mathbb A$ that satisfy a fixed first-order sentence $\phi$ hereditarily, i.e., we require that every (induced) substructure of $\mathbb A$ satisfies $\phi$. We call the corresponding computational problem the hereditary model checking problem for $\phi$, and denote it by Her$(\phi)$. We present a complete description of the quantifier prefixes for $\phi$ such that Her$(\phi)$ is in P; we show that for every other quantifier prefix there exists a formula $\phi$ with this prefix such that Her$(\phi)$ is coNP-complete. Specifically, we show that if $Q$ is of the form $\forall^\ast\exists\forall^\ast$ or of the form $\forall^\ast\exists^\ast$, then Her$(\phi)$ can be solved in polynomial time whenever the quantifier prefix of $\phi$ is $Q$. Otherwise, $Q$ contains $\exists \exists \forall$ or $\exists \forall \exists$ as a subword, and in this case, there is a first-order formula $\phi$ whose quantifier prefix is $Q$ and Her$(\phi)$ is coNP-complete. Moreover, we show that there is no algorithm that decides for a given first-order formula $\phi$ whether Her$(\phi)$ is in P (unless P$=$NP).
fields
math.RA 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Network Satisfaction Problem for Relation Algebras with at most 4 Atoms
Every finite relation algebra with at most four atoms has a network satisfaction problem that is either in P or NP-hard, with the paper determining which.