Evaluation finds Random Subset (RS) superior for small groups (G ≤ 5) and Closest Available Neighbor First (CANF) superior for large groups (G ≥ 10) using synthetic and real point clouds.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.MM 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
An Evaluation of Decentralized Group Formation Techniques for Flying Light Specks
Evaluation finds Random Subset (RS) superior for small groups (G ≤ 5) and Closest Available Neighbor First (CANF) superior for large groups (G ≥ 10) using synthetic and real point clouds.