pith. sign in

hub Canonical reference

Capabilities of Gemini Models in Medicine

Canonical reference. 86% of citing Pith papers cite this work as background.

28 Pith papers citing it
Background 86% of classified citations
abstract

Excellence in a wide variety of medical applications poses considerable challenges for AI, requiring advanced reasoning, access to up-to-date medical knowledge and understanding of complex multimodal data. Gemini models, with strong general capabilities in multimodal and long-context reasoning, offer exciting possibilities in medicine. Building on these core strengths of Gemini, we introduce Med-Gemini, a family of highly capable multimodal models that are specialized in medicine with the ability to seamlessly use web search, and that can be efficiently tailored to novel modalities using custom encoders. We evaluate Med-Gemini on 14 medical benchmarks, establishing new state-of-the-art (SoTA) performance on 10 of them, and surpass the GPT-4 model family on every benchmark where a direct comparison is viable, often by a wide margin. On the popular MedQA (USMLE) benchmark, our best-performing Med-Gemini model achieves SoTA performance of 91.1% accuracy, using a novel uncertainty-guided search strategy. On 7 multimodal benchmarks including NEJM Image Challenges and MMMU (health & medicine), Med-Gemini improves over GPT-4V by an average relative margin of 44.5%. We demonstrate the effectiveness of Med-Gemini's long-context capabilities through SoTA performance on a needle-in-a-haystack retrieval task from long de-identified health records and medical video question answering, surpassing prior bespoke methods using only in-context learning. Finally, Med-Gemini's performance suggests real-world utility by surpassing human experts on tasks such as medical text summarization, alongside demonstrations of promising potential for multimodal medical dialogue, medical research and education. Taken together, our results offer compelling evidence for Med-Gemini's potential, although further rigorous evaluation will be crucial before real-world deployment in this safety-critical domain.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 6 baseline 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

RadThinking: A Dataset for Longitudinal Clinical Reasoning in Radiology

cs.CV · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

RadThinking releases a large longitudinal CT VQA dataset stratified into foundation perception questions, single-rule reasoning questions, and compositional multi-step chains grounded in clinical reporting standards for cancer screening.

Towards an AI co-scientist

cs.AI · 2025-02-26 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

A multi-agent AI system generates novel biomedical hypotheses that show promising experimental validation in drug repurposing for leukemia, new targets for liver fibrosis, and a bacterial gene transfer mechanism.

HuatuoGPT-o1, Towards Medical Complex Reasoning with LLMs

cs.CL · 2024-12-25 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

HuatuoGPT-o1 achieves superior medical complex reasoning by using a verifier to curate reasoning trajectories for fine-tuning and then applying RL with verifier-based rewards.

Measuring the metacognition of AI

cs.AI · 2026-03-31 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Meta-d' and signal detection theory provide quantitative tools to assess metacognitive sensitivity and risk-based regulation in large language models.

NVILA: Efficient Frontier Visual Language Models

cs.CV · 2024-12-05 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

NVILA improves on VILA with a scale-then-compress visual token strategy and full-lifecycle efficiency optimizations, matching or exceeding leading VLMs on image and video benchmarks while reducing training cost 1.9-5.1x and latencies 1.2-2.8x.

QM-ToT: A Medical Tree of Thoughts Reasoning Framework for Quantized Model

cs.CL · 2025-04-13 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

QM-ToT applies Tree of Thoughts decomposition and evaluator layers to quantized LLMs, reporting accuracy gains from 34% to 50% on MedQAUSMLE for LLaMA2-70b and from 58.77% to 69.49% for LLaMA-3.1-8b, plus an 86.27% improvement in data distillation using only 3.9% of the data.

citing papers explorer

Showing 28 of 28 citing papers.