A certified exact-arithmetic counterexample shows the stationary quantum mechanical bootstrap at level three is not tight in two dimensions, while eigenstate constraints seem to close the gap.
Quantum variational embedding for ground-state energy problems: sum of squares and cluster selection
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We introduce a sum-of-squares SDP hierarchy approximating the ground-state energy from below for quantum many-body problems, with a natural quantum embedding interpretation. We establish the connections between our approach and other variational methods for lower bounds, including the variational embedding, the RDM method in quantum chemistry, and the Anderson bounds. Additionally, inspired by the quantum information theory, we propose efficient strategies for optimizing cluster selection to tighten SDP relaxations while staying within a computational budget. Numerical experiments are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of our strategy. As a byproduct of our investigation, we find that quantum entanglement has the potential to capture the underlying graph of the many-body Hamiltonian.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SC 1years
2026 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1roles
method 1polarities
use method 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Stationarity is not enough: tightness of the quantum mechanical bootstrap and the copositive cone
A certified exact-arithmetic counterexample shows the stationary quantum mechanical bootstrap at level three is not tight in two dimensions, while eigenstate constraints seem to close the gap.