Aperture shape and f-number from 1.8 to 3.4 show no statistically significant effect on YOLOv8 detection precision in simulated automotive images, with degradation only at 48 dB gain.
Sensitivity analysis of AI-based algorithms for autonomous driving on optical wavefront aberrations induced by the windshield
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Autonomous driving perception techniques are typically based on supervised machine learning models that are trained on real-world street data. A typical training process involves capturing images with a single car model and windshield configuration. However, deploying these trained models on different car types can lead to a domain shift, which can potentially hurt the neural networks performance and violate working ADAS requirements. To address this issue, this paper investigates the domain shift problem further by evaluating the sensitivity of two perception models to different windshield configurations. This is done by evaluating the dependencies between neural network benchmark metrics and optical merit functions by applying a Fourier optics based threat model. Our results show that there is a performance gap introduced by windshields and existing optical metrics used for posing requirements might not be sufficient.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CV 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
On the Relation between Optical Aperture and Automotive Object Detection
Aperture shape and f-number from 1.8 to 3.4 show no statistically significant effect on YOLOv8 detection precision in simulated automotive images, with degradation only at 48 dB gain.