An empirical study finds that human and LLM judgments on pedagogical quality of pretest questions disagree systematically, with rubric operationalization affecting alignment more than evaluation mode.
and Sana, Faria , title =
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.HC 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Why Machines Misread Pedagogical Quality: Human-Machine Alignment in LLM-Based Pretest Question Evaluation
An empirical study finds that human and LLM judgments on pedagogical quality of pretest questions disagree systematically, with rubric operationalization affecting alignment more than evaluation mode.