Argues that LLM guardrails generate unethical reality gaps by shifting epistemic risk to users and that ethical AI can become unethical when it prioritizes institutional reassurance over accurate perception.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision,
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Ethics of LLM Sandbox and Persona Dynamics
Argues that LLM guardrails generate unethical reality gaps by shifting epistemic risk to users and that ethical AI can become unethical when it prioritizes institutional reassurance over accurate perception.