pith. sign in

Watch Before You Answer: Learning from Visually Grounded Post-Training

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it
abstract

It is critical for vision-language models (VLMs) to comprehensively understand visual, temporal, and textual cues. However, despite rapid progress in multimodal modeling, video understanding performance still lags behind text-based reasoning. In this work, we find that progress is even worse than previously assumed: commonly reported long video understanding benchmarks contain 40-60% of questions that can be answered using text cues alone. Furthermore, we find that these issues are also pervasive in widely used post-training datasets, potentially undercutting the ability of post-training to improve VLM video understanding performance. Guided by this observation, we introduce VidGround as a simple yet effective solution: using only the actual visually grounded questions without any linguistic biases for post-training. When used in tandem with RL-based post-training algorithms, this simple technique improves performance by up to 6.2 points relative to using the full dataset, while using only 69.1% of the original post-training data. Moreover, we show that data curation with a simple post-training algorithm outperforms several more complex post-training techniques, highlighting that data quality is a major bottleneck for improving video understanding in VLMs. These results underscore the importance of curating post-training data and evaluation benchmarks that truly require visual grounding to advance the development of more capable VLMs. Project page: http://vidground.etuagi.com.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.AI 1 cs.CV 1

years

2026 2

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 2

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

RewardHarness: Self-Evolving Agentic Post-Training

cs.AI · 2026-05-09 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

RewardHarness self-evolves a tool-and-skill library from 100 preference examples to reach 47.4% accuracy on image-edit evaluation, beating GPT-5, and yields stronger RL-tuned models.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.