Pith. sign in

Does GPT Really Get It? A Hierarchical Scale to Quantify Human vs AI's Understanding of Algorithms

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

As Large Language Models (LLMs) perform (and sometimes excel at) more and more complex cognitive tasks, a natural question is whether AI really understands. The study of understanding in LLMs is in its infancy, and the community has yet to incorporate well-trodden research in philosophy, psychology, and education. We initiate this, specifically focusing on understanding algorithms, and propose a hierarchy of levels of understanding. We use the hierarchy to design and conduct a study with human subjects (undergraduate and graduate students) as well as large language models (generations of GPT), revealing interesting similarities and differences. We expect that our rigorous criteria will be useful to keep track of AI's progress in such cognitive domains.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

A Mathematical Framework for AI-Human Integration in Work

cs.AI · 2025-05-29 · conditional · novelty 6.0

A formal job-accuracy model shows that job success can jump sharply near a critical ability threshold, and combining workers with complementary decision and action subskills can create superadditive gains, formalizing productivity compression.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • A Mathematical Framework for AI-Human Integration in Work cs.AI · 2025-05-29 · conditional · none · ref 53 · internal anchor

    A formal job-accuracy model shows that job success can jump sharply near a critical ability threshold, and combining workers with complementary decision and action subskills can create superadditive gains, formalizing productivity compression.