REVIEW 1 cited by
Does GPT Really Get It? A Hierarchical Scale to Quantify Human vs AI's Understanding of Algorithms
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As Large Language Models (LLMs) perform (and sometimes excel at) more and more complex cognitive tasks, a natural question is whether AI really understands. The study of understanding in LLMs is in its infancy, and the community has yet to incorporate well-trodden research in philosophy, psychology, and education. We initiate this, specifically focusing on understanding algorithms, and propose a hierarchy of levels of understanding. We use the hierarchy to design and conduct a study with human subjects (undergraduate and graduate students) as well as large language models (generations of GPT), revealing interesting similarities and differences. We expect that our rigorous criteria will be useful to keep track of AI's progress in such cognitive domains.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Mathematical Framework for AI-Human Integration in Work
A formal job-accuracy model shows that job success can jump sharply near a critical ability threshold, and combining workers with complementary decision and action subskills can create superadditive gains, formalizing...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.