TikTok formally complies with DSA rules against profiling minors but delivers 5-8 times stronger interest-based targeting through undisclosed influencer and promotional content.
Title resolution pending
7 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
7
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 3
dataset 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 7verdicts
UNVERDICTED 7polarities
background 3representative citing papers
Teachers' views on AI benefits and risks vary widely across 55 countries, but LLMs compress these differences, overestimate both sides, and show little improvement from country prompting or better reasoning.
Moral judgments become more deontological when human design of AI is visible, and designers are judged more strictly than the AI or unaided humans, creating plural and non-converging targets for value alignment.
Adaptive Prompt Elicitation (APE) uses an information-theoretic framework to generate visual queries that elicit and compile user intent into better prompts for text-to-image models, showing improved alignment in benchmarks and a user study.
Structured dataset documentation shows little engagement with major reflexivity themes from FAccT literature, leading to a new codebook and extended datasheet questions.
A literature review concludes that pursuing consensus in data annotation creates biased AI by dismissing subjective disagreements and enforcing geographic hegemony, and proposes mapping diversity instead.
A budget split intervention reduces gender skew in online ad delivery by incorporating users with unknown demographics alongside targeted inferred-gender groups.
citing papers explorer
-
The DSA's Blind Spot: Algorithmic Audit of Advertising and Minor Profiling on TikTok
TikTok formally complies with DSA rules against profiling minors but delivers 5-8 times stronger interest-based targeting through undisclosed influencer and promotional content.
-
Teachers' Perceived Benefits and Risks of AI Across Fifty-Five Countries: An Audit of LLM Alignment and Steerability
Teachers' views on AI benefits and risks vary widely across 55 countries, but LLMs compress these differences, overestimate both sides, and show little improvement from country prompting or better reasoning.
-
The Alignment Target Problem: Divergent Moral Judgments of Humans, AI Systems, and Their Designers
Moral judgments become more deontological when human design of AI is visible, and designers are judged more strictly than the AI or unaided humans, creating plural and non-converging targets for value alignment.
-
Adaptive Prompt Elicitation for Text-to-Image Generation
Adaptive Prompt Elicitation (APE) uses an information-theoretic framework to generate visual queries that elicit and compile user intent into better prompts for text-to-image models, showing improved alignment in benchmarks and a user study.
-
Evaluating Structured Documentation as a Tool for Reflexivity in Dataset Development
Structured dataset documentation shows little engagement with major reflexivity themes from FAccT literature, leading to a new codebook and extended datasheet questions.
-
The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotation
A literature review concludes that pursuing consensus in data annotation creates biased AI by dismissing subjective disagreements and enforcing geographic hegemony, and proposes mapping diversity instead.
-
Into the Unknown: Accounting for Missing Demographic Data when Mitigating Ad Delivery Skew
A budget split intervention reduces gender skew in online ad delivery by incorporating users with unknown demographics alongside targeted inferred-gender groups.