Pith. sign in

Investigating the Effectiveness of BPE : The Power of Shorter Sequences

5 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

5 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CL 5

years

2026 5

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Tokenisation via Convex Relaxations

cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

ConvexTok uses convex relaxation of tokenization to a linear program, improving intrinsic metrics, bits-per-byte, and some downstream tasks while certifying near-optimality within 1% at typical vocabulary sizes.

Tokenization with Split Trees

cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

ToaST uses vocabulary-independent split trees and integer programming to produce tokenizers with over 11% fewer tokens than BPE, WordPiece, and UnigramLM while improving 1.5B-parameter LM scores on CORE.

Compute Optimal Tokenization

cs.CL · 2026-05-02 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

In compute-optimal regimes, language model parameter count scales proportionally with data bytes rather than tokens, and the optimal compression rate decreases with increasing compute.

citing papers explorer

Showing 5 of 5 citing papers.

  • MinGram: A Minimalist Unigram Tokenizer with High Compression and Competitive Morphological Alignment cs.CL · 2026-06-25 · unverdicted · none · ref 51

    MinGram is a simplified Unigram tokenizer training method that prioritizes token count minimization to deliver higher compression than BPE and standard Unigram while retaining competitive morphological alignment and superior bits-per-byte performance in language model training.

  • Tokenisation via Convex Relaxations cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · none · ref 22

    ConvexTok uses convex relaxation of tokenization to a linear program, improving intrinsic metrics, bits-per-byte, and some downstream tasks while certifying near-optimality within 1% at typical vocabulary sizes.

  • Tokenization with Split Trees cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · none · ref 44

    ToaST uses vocabulary-independent split trees and integer programming to produce tokenizers with over 11% fewer tokens than BPE, WordPiece, and UnigramLM while improving 1.5B-parameter LM scores on CORE.

  • Where to cut, how deep: BPE and Unigram-LM on chemistry SMILES cs.CL · 2026-07-06 · accept · none · ref 10

    On chemistry SMILES with a fixed 165-token base, BPE and Unigram-LM produce near-disjoint vocabularies (Jaccard ≤0.161) and Unigram-LM emits 29–41% more tokens across 22 matched conditions.

  • Compute Optimal Tokenization cs.CL · 2026-05-02 · unverdicted · none · ref 30

    In compute-optimal regimes, language model parameter count scales proportionally with data bytes rather than tokens, and the optimal compression rate decreases with increasing compute.