Proposes and open-sources an automated framework for species-fair security comparisons of human-written, LLM-generated, and hybrid code, validated via feasibility study.
Comparing the Usability of Cryptographic APIs
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.CR 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Presents intent-based API design patterns using Protocol Buffers, scopes for algorithm decoupling, stable key IDs, and abstract policies to enable cryptographic agility without application code changes.
citing papers explorer
-
How to Compare the Security of Code Written by Humans to LLM-generated Code
Proposes and open-sources an automated framework for species-fair security comparisons of human-written, LLM-generated, and hybrid code, validated via feasibility study.
-
Intent-Based Cryptographic API Design for Cryptographic Agility
Presents intent-based API design patterns using Protocol Buffers, scopes for algorithm decoupling, stable key IDs, and abstract policies to enable cryptographic agility without application code changes.