pith. sign in

Can we trust embodied agents? exploring backdoor attacks against embodied llm-based decision-making systems

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

dataset 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CR 2

years

2026 2

roles

dataset 1

polarities

use dataset 1

representative citing papers

Alignment Contracts for Agentic Security Systems

cs.CR · 2026-04-30 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Alignment contracts define scope, allowed effects, budgets and disclosure rules as safety properties over finite effect traces, with decidable admissibility, refinement rules, and Lean-verified soundness under an observability assumption.

Semantic Denial of Service in LLM-controlled robots

cs.CR · 2026-04-25 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Injecting brief safety-plausible phrases into robot audio triggers LLM safety halts, enabling semantic denial-of-service attacks where prompt defenses trade attack suppression for impaired genuine hazard detection.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.

  • Alignment Contracts for Agentic Security Systems cs.CR · 2026-04-30 · conditional · full · ref 24

    Alignment contracts define scope, allowed effects, budgets and disclosure rules as safety properties over finite effect traces, with decidable admissibility, refinement rules, and Lean-verified soundness under an observability assumption.

  • Semantic Denial of Service in LLM-controlled robots cs.CR · 2026-04-25 · unverdicted · none · ref 16

    Injecting brief safety-plausible phrases into robot audio triggers LLM safety halts, enabling semantic denial-of-service attacks where prompt defenses trade attack suppression for impaired genuine hazard detection.