pith. sign in

hub

Re-evaluating Continual Learning Scenarios: A Categorization and Case for Strong Baselines

11 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

11 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Continual learning has received a great deal of attention recently with several approaches being proposed. However, evaluations involve a diverse set of scenarios making meaningful comparison difficult. This work provides a systematic categorization of the scenarios and evaluates them within a consistent framework including strong baselines and state-of-the-art methods. The results provide an understanding of the relative difficulty of the scenarios and that simple baselines (Adagrad, L2 regularization, and naive rehearsal strategies) can surprisingly achieve similar performance to current mainstream methods. We conclude with several suggestions for creating harder evaluation scenarios and future research directions. The code is available at https://github.com/GT-RIPL/Continual-Learning-Benchmark

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 2

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.LG 10 cs.CV 1

roles

background 2

polarities

background 2

representative citing papers

Exemplar-Free Continual Learning for State Space Models

cs.LG · 2025-05-24 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Inf-SSM constrains the infinite-horizon evolution of SSMs via Grassmannian geometry and an efficient O(n^2) Sylvester solver to enable exemplar-free continual learning with reduced forgetting.

A Survey of Continual Reinforcement Learning

cs.LG · 2025-06-27 · accept · novelty 6.0

The paper surveys CRL literature, proposes a taxonomy of methods into four categories based on knowledge storage and transfer, reviews metrics and benchmarks, and outlines challenges and future research directions.

citing papers explorer

Showing 11 of 11 citing papers.