Pith. sign in

hub Mixed citations

A Multitask, Multilingual, Multimodal Evaluation of ChatGPT on Reasoning, Hallucination, and Interactivity

Mixed citation behavior. Most common role is background (67%).

25 Pith papers citing it
355 external citations · Pith
Background 67% of classified citations
abstract

This paper proposes a framework for quantitatively evaluating interactive LLMs such as ChatGPT using publicly available data sets. We carry out an extensive technical evaluation of ChatGPT using 23 data sets covering 8 different common NLP application tasks. We evaluate the multitask, multilingual and multi-modal aspects of ChatGPT based on these data sets and a newly designed multimodal dataset. We find that ChatGPT outperforms LLMs with zero-shot learning on most tasks and even outperforms fine-tuned models on some tasks. We find that it is better at understanding non-Latin script languages than generating them. It is able to generate multimodal content from textual prompts, via an intermediate code generation step. Moreover, we find that ChatGPT is 63.41% accurate on average in 10 different reasoning categories under logical reasoning, non-textual reasoning, and commonsense reasoning, hence making it an unreliable reasoner. It is, for example, better at deductive than inductive reasoning. ChatGPT suffers from hallucination problems like other LLMs and it generates more extrinsic hallucinations from its parametric memory as it does not have access to an external knowledge base. Finally, the interactive feature of ChatGPT enables human collaboration with the underlying LLM to improve its performance, i.e, 8% ROUGE-1 on summarization and 2% ChrF++ on machine translation, in a multi-turn "prompt engineering" fashion. We also release codebase for evaluation set extraction.

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 5 method 1

citation-polarity summary

representative citing papers

Towards Agentic Runtime Healing

cs.SE · 2024-08-02 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Healer uses LLMs to dynamically generate and execute runtime error-handling code, with GPT-4 recovering from 72.8% of errors across four datasets.

An Embodied Generalist Agent in 3D World

cs.CV · 2023-11-18 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

LEO is an embodied generalist agent that performs 3D captioning, question answering, reasoning, navigation, and manipulation after 3D vision-language alignment followed by vision-language-action instruction tuning on large-scale object- and scene-level datasets.

Low-Resource Languages Jailbreak GPT-4

cs.CL · 2023-10-03 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Translating unsafe inputs to low-resource languages jailbreaks GPT-4 at rates on par with or exceeding state-of-the-art attacks.

PDF Retrieval Augmented Question Answering

cs.CL · 2025-06-22 · unverdicted · novelty 3.0

Develops a multimodal RAG QA system for PDFs by processing non-textual elements and fine-tuning LLMs to handle complex queries combining multiple data types.

citing papers explorer

Showing 25 of 25 citing papers.