MM-JudgeBench shows substantial cross-lingual performance variance in 22 LVLM judges, with model size and architecture as poor predictors of multilingual robustness.
Journal of artificial intelligence research , volume=
6 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
6
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
A score-ranking loss enables controllable summarization by aligning outputs to evaluation scores, matching SOTA performance with dimension-specific control on LLaMA, Qwen, and Mistral.
IAP uses RL to train LLMs to explicitly infer and apply implicit user intent in single-turn personalized QA, achieving ~7.5% average macro-score gains over baselines on LaMP-QA.
Skill1 trains a single RL policy to co-evolve skill selection, utilization, and distillation in language model agents from one task-outcome reward, using low-frequency trends to credit selection and high-frequency variation to credit distillation, outperforming baselines on ALFWorld and WebShop.
ARGUS uses a Prosecutor-Defender-Umpire multi-agent setup plus RAG and chain-of-thought rewards to adapt ad policy enforcement to new regulations using minimal fresh labels.
The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.
citing papers explorer
-
Lost in Translation: Do LVLM Judges Generalize Across Languages?
MM-JudgeBench shows substantial cross-lingual performance variance in 22 LVLM judges, with model size and architecture as poor predictors of multilingual robustness.
-
Learning to Control Summaries with Score Ranking
A score-ranking loss enables controllable summarization by aligning outputs to evaluation scores, matching SOTA performance with dimension-specific control on LLaMA, Qwen, and Mistral.
-
Training LLMs with Reinforcement Learning for Intent-Aware Personalized Question Answering
IAP uses RL to train LLMs to explicitly infer and apply implicit user intent in single-turn personalized QA, achieving ~7.5% average macro-score gains over baselines on LaMP-QA.
-
Skill1: Unified Evolution of Skill-Augmented Agents via Reinforcement Learning
Skill1 trains a single RL policy to co-evolve skill selection, utilization, and distillation in language model agents from one task-outcome reward, using low-frequency trends to credit selection and high-frequency variation to credit distillation, outperforming baselines on ALFWorld and WebShop.
-
ARGUS: Policy-Adaptive Ad Governance via Evolving Reinforcement with Adversarial Umpiring
ARGUS uses a Prosecutor-Defender-Umpire multi-agent setup plus RAG and chain-of-thought rewards to adapt ad policy enforcement to new regulations using minimal fresh labels.
-
A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: What, When, How, and Where to Evolve on the Path to Artificial Super Intelligence
The paper delivers the first systematic review of self-evolving agents, structured around what components evolve, when adaptation occurs, and how it is implemented.