A nine-dimension risk framework for institutional DeFi adds three new dimensions to prior taxonomies and shows that five of twelve 2024-2026 incidents, including the two most systemic, require at least one of the new dimensions for full explanation.
Systemic risk in DeFi: A network-based fragility analysis of TVL dynamics
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
DeFi vault risk is decomposed into three levels with six on-chain mechanical features generating new loss channels, yielding five aggregated credit risk metrics and an on-chain estimation architecture.
Yearn USDC vault delivered 5.41% annual yield on 15.7M USD while Cian stETH vault delivered 4.22% on 54M USD with higher leverage risk; analysis extends DSR model to expose structural dependencies.
citing papers explorer
-
Toward a Risk Assessment Framework for Institutional DeFi: A Nine-Dimension Approach
A nine-dimension risk framework for institutional DeFi adds three new dimensions to prior taxonomies and shows that five of twelve 2024-2026 incidents, including the two most systemic, require at least one of the new dimensions for full explanation.
-
Vault as a credit instrument
DeFi vault risk is decomposed into three levels with six on-chain mechanical features generating new loss channels, yielding five aggregated credit risk metrics and an on-chain estimation architecture.
-
DeFi Yield Aggregators: Analysing Investment Strategies and Structural Dependencies
Yearn USDC vault delivered 5.41% annual yield on 15.7M USD while Cian stETH vault delivered 4.22% on 54M USD with higher leverage risk; analysis extends DSR model to expose structural dependencies.