A systematic benchmark and architecture comparison shows that hierarchical pooling and pooled cross-attention usually beat concatenation for PLM-based protein-protein binding affinity prediction, although statistical significance is not established.
Revealing data leakage in protein interaction benchmarks
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In recent years, there has been remarkable progress in machine learning for protein-protein interactions. However, prior work has predominantly focused on improving learning algorithms, with less attention paid to evaluation strategies and data preparation. Here, we demonstrate that further development of machine learning methods may be hindered by the quality of existing train-test splits. Specifically, we find that commonly used splitting strategies for protein complexes, based on protein sequence or metadata similarity, introduce major data leakage. This may result in overoptimistic evaluation of generalization, as well as unfair benchmarking of the models, biased towards assessing their overfitting capacity rather than practical utility. To overcome the data leakage, we recommend constructing data splits based on 3D structural similarity of protein-protein interfaces and suggest corresponding algorithms. We believe that addressing the data leakage problem is critical for further progress in this research area.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Beyond Simple Concatenation: Fairly Assessing PLM Architectures for Multi-Chain Protein-Protein Interactions Prediction
A systematic benchmark and architecture comparison shows that hierarchical pooling and pooled cross-attention usually beat concatenation for PLM-based protein-protein binding affinity prediction, although statistical significance is not established.