Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Revealing data leakage in protein interaction benchmarks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.10457 v1 pith:665MDBT6 submitted 2024-04-16 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords dataleakagelearningproteinalgorithmsevaluationfurthermachine
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, there has been remarkable progress in machine learning for protein-protein interactions. However, prior work has predominantly focused on improving learning algorithms, with less attention paid to evaluation strategies and data preparation. Here, we demonstrate that further development of machine learning methods may be hindered by the quality of existing train-test splits. Specifically, we find that commonly used splitting strategies for protein complexes, based on protein sequence or metadata similarity, introduce major data leakage. This may result in overoptimistic evaluation of generalization, as well as unfair benchmarking of the models, biased towards assessing their overfitting capacity rather than practical utility. To overcome the data leakage, we recommend constructing data splits based on 3D structural similarity of protein-protein interfaces and suggest corresponding algorithms. We believe that addressing the data leakage problem is critical for further progress in this research area.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Simple Concatenation: Fairly Assessing PLM Architectures for Multi-Chain Protein-Protein Interactions Prediction

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematic benchmark and architecture comparison shows that hierarchical pooling and pooled cross-attention usually beat concatenation for PLM-based protein-protein binding affinity prediction, although statistical ...

Pith tools