Scattering cold Jupiters disrupt inner mean-motion resonances via secular perturbations from their orbital history, driving resonance circulation in most 2:1 and 3:2 configurations and explaining the Kepler period ratio distribution.
Title resolution pending
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
fields
astro-ph.EP 4years
2026 4verdicts
UNVERDICTED 4representative citing papers
Scattering between close-in super-Earths and secularly perturbed cold planets can launch some planets into free-floating orbits.
Sub-Neptunes around metal-rich stars have a 42.6% conditional probability of cold Jupiters versus 14.5% for super-Earths, showing a metallicity-dependent correlation absent in the latter.
Giant planet multiplicity is low, with 10.6% and 15.8% of Sun-like stars hosting at least one giant planet within 10 au across the two surveys, mostly as singles, inconsistent with scattering models.
citing papers explorer
-
Impact of Cold Jupiter Scattering on the Mean-Motion Resonance of Inner Small Planets
Scattering cold Jupiters disrupt inner mean-motion resonances via secular perturbations from their orbital history, driving resonance circulation in most 2:1 and 3:2 configurations and explaining the Kepler period ratio distribution.
-
A Robust Launching Mechanism for Freely-Floating Planets from Host Stars with Close-in Planets
Scattering between close-in super-Earths and secularly perturbed cold planets can launch some planets into free-floating orbits.
-
Sub-Neptunes Show a Stronger Correlation with Cold Jupiters than Super-Earths Especially in Metal-rich Systems
Sub-Neptunes around metal-rich stars have a 42.6% conditional probability of cold Jupiters versus 14.5% for super-Earths, showing a metallicity-dependent correlation absent in the latter.
-
The Intrinsic Multiplicity Distribution of Exoplanets Revealed from the Radial Velocity Method. II. Constraints on Giant Planet Multiplicity from Different Surveys
Giant planet multiplicity is low, with 10.6% and 15.8% of Sun-like stars hosting at least one giant planet within 10 au across the two surveys, mostly as singles, inconsistent with scattering models.