For AVWCs strong secrecy capacity equals semantic secrecy capacity; for GAVWCs the gap is bounded and vanishes if the jammer choice is sub-double-exponential in block length.
A cryptographic treatment of the wiretap channel
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.IT 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
PAC codes match polar secrecy bounds while improving reliability and both provide tighter finite-length semantic secrecy than invertible-extractor schemes over the wiretap BSC.
citing papers explorer
-
Cryptographic and Information-theoretic Security Capacities for General Arbitrarily Varying Wiretap Channels
For AVWCs strong secrecy capacity equals semantic secrecy capacity; for GAVWCs the gap is bounded and vanishes if the jammer choice is sub-double-exponential in block length.
-
Finite-Length Empirical Comparison of Polar, PAC, and Invertible-Extractor Secrecy Codes over the Wiretap BSC
PAC codes match polar secrecy bounds while improving reliability and both provide tighter finite-length semantic secrecy than invertible-extractor schemes over the wiretap BSC.