pith. sign in

Synthsaebench: Evaluating sparse autoencoders on scalable realistic synthetic data

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

clear filters

representative citing papers

Are Sparse Autoencoder Benchmarks Reliable?

cs.LG · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

An audit of SAEBench reveals that Targeted Probe Perturbation and Spurious Correlation Removal metrics fail reliability tests and should not be used to evaluate sparse autoencoders.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper after filters.

  • Are Sparse Autoencoder Benchmarks Reliable? cs.LG · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · none · ref 7

    An audit of SAEBench reveals that Targeted Probe Perturbation and Spurious Correlation Removal metrics fail reliability tests and should not be used to evaluate sparse autoencoders.